How about some Hanuman stories

Since we have our proof that Hanuman is still hanging around in India, it seems a timely moment to share some of the stories of his devotional adventures with Ram.

You can click here for the link to the full YouTube video set of these, and below is his meeting with Ram:

Jai Bajarangbali!

Posted by Steve

Sun sets on celebrations of Ram Navami

Tuesday across India (and, I’m sure, elsewhere) were celebrations for Ram Navami, the birth of Ram. Here’s how DNA describes it:

Ram Navami or Shri Ram Navami is celebrated to commemorate the birth of Lord Rama, believed to be the seventh incarnation of Lord Vishnu, born to King Dasharatha and Queen Kaushalya of Ayodhya.

Rama, the seventh avatar of Vishnu’s Dashavatar came into existence to destroy Ravana as per Hindu mythology.

Hindu believers usually observe the day with chanting of mantras, fasting and reading passages from the Ramayana. The Ram Navami fast begins from sunrise and ends when it’s sunset.

Major celebrations are found to occur in Ayodhya (Uttar Pradesh), Rameshwaram (Tamil Nadu), Bhadrachalam (Andhra Pradesh) and Sitamarhi (Bihar) though it is celebrated by all Hindus around the world.

Every region in India has their own specific way of celebrating the festival.

Below is a collection of photos:

Here in Los Angeles, we have a couple of hours left. And we never need an excuse to read from the Ramayana.

Posted by Steve


Got 2 hours to devote to Hanuman?

It’s Tuesday. Ram’s day but also — by bhakti default, if you will — Hanuman’s.

If you’re unlike me and have two hours and 15 minutes to watch a movie, I might suggest the following:

Mahabali Hanuman, from 1981. According to IMBD, it was written and directed by Babubhai Mistri, but I think far more intriguing is that it stars….

Hercules. As Hanuman. Sadly, I’m not familiar enough with early ’80s Indian movies to know if the funny coincidence of this is at all on purpose. Hercules does play “Wrestler” in another film, IMBD says.

Well, here it is, via Youtube. Watch some, watch all. And where Ravana’s concerned, WATCH OUT!

Posted by Steve

One reason not to do Ashtanga

A couple of weeks ago, I recounted a conversation I had in Mt. Shasta that boiled down to: “Here’s a reason to try Ashtanga.”

The reason? Most simply put, the physical benefits. (Do those benefits pay off as well as Bikram? I don’t know.)

Now, I don’t think there’s anything inherently wrong with first coming to yoga with an emphasis on the physical payoff. After all, the point of asana practice is to get our bodies healthy enough and capable to sit in meditation on our way to Samadhi. And is anyone really going to argue that a healthy body is a bad thing?

I doubt it. Where I’m sure there is argument — justifiably so, in my opinion — is when yoga, or Ashtanga, feeds an ego trip. I’m sure we all can think of someone we believe is getting more attached to their yoga body, rather than less, as they practice.

I’m also sure that if we all are honest, we’d have to admit to having our egos fed by the practice. I’m working hard, for instance, on my pull backs — I want to be able to do them without touching the ground until I’m in my Chaturanga.

But as David Swenson would say: “Will I be happier when I can do that?” (My ego-filled answer: Of course! But, upon more reflection: Right, exactly what kind of happiness am I seeking?)

This struggle with the ego is ongoing. But, as I say, when you start yoga or Ashtanga, I think it is totally understandable that the ego is strong, is in charge.

But here’s the catch, and here’s the reason not to do Ashtanga: That ego of yours is going to get broken down.

When I explained on the Shasta retreat all the physical benefits I’d discovered from Ashtanga, I didn’t mention the — how best to put it? — subtle body changes. You know what I’m talking about:

  • The desire to avoid eating meat.
  • The growing interest in the other seven limbs of Ashtanga, especially the yamas and niyamas.
  • Perhaps a toning down of the Type A personality you’ve been fighting all your life.
  • A curiosity about that Ram, Sita or Krishna person you keep hearing about.
  • A rising desire to visit India.

I’m sure there are others, and I won’t admit that I have any first-hand experience with any of the above.

But I will warn that there can be unforeseen consequences of an Ashtanga practice. Why exactly? Who knows. My own best guess, which I think only partially explains things — and I think this is true of Ashtanga but not flow classes, Bikram or most other Hatha styles — is that Ashtanga boils down to being a meditative practice. There’s next to no sound other than people’s breathing, your focusing your gaze on fixed points and you are alone with yourself for 75 minutes, 90 minutes, maybe 120 minutes?

Sort of sounds like meditation, right?

My understanding is Guruji didn’t teach people to meditate. (I know I’ve heard tales of this, but I can’t remember details. Apologies!) I wonder if he didn’t do so because he knew he already was teaching them. And then it was up to them to move deeper and let it work.

Be careful. Enter at your risk. Because work it definitely does.

Post by Steve